PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long US 500 ETP Securities (5SPY.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5SPY.L achieves a 35.46% return, which is significantly higher than 3USL.L's 25.13% return.


5SPY.L

1D
0.00%
1M
22.23%
YTD
35.46%
6M
35.04%
1Y
119.12%
3Y*
55.62%
5Y*
10Y*

3USL.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
12.76%
YTD
25.13%
6M
26.49%
1Y
77.77%
3Y*
50.50%
5Y*
22.25%
10Y*
28.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
5SPY.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long US 500 ETP Securities
35.46%1.52%98.06%100.80%-80.81%13.40%
3USL.L
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB
25.13%28.97%64.00%70.49%-57.35%9.63%

Correlation

The correlation between 5SPY.L and 3USL.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.98

The correlation between 5SPY.L and 3USL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
5SPY.L
3USL.L

Technology

36.2%
36.9%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.6%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.0%

Industrials

8.1%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
2.8%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.5%

Technology

5SPY.L
36.2%
3USL.L
36.9%

Financial Services

5SPY.L
11.9%
3USL.L
12.6%

Communication Services

5SPY.L
10.9%
3USL.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5SPY.L
10.1%
3USL.L
10.7%

Healthcare

5SPY.L
8.4%
3USL.L
9.0%

Industrials

5SPY.L
8.1%
3USL.L
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

5SPY.L
4.9%
3USL.L
4.7%

Energy

5SPY.L
3.5%
3USL.L
2.8%

Utilities

5SPY.L
2.3%
3USL.L
2.3%

Real Estate

5SPY.L
1.9%
3USL.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

5SPY.L
1.8%
3USL.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5SPY.L
5SPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
5SPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5SPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
5SPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
5SPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
5SPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

3USL.L
3USL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
3USL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3USL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
3USL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3USL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
3USL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long US 500 ETP Securities (5SPY.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5SPY.L3USL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.06

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

12.28

-2.90

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5SPY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the 3USL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5SPY.L and 3USL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5SPY.L3USL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.25

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.60

-0.54

Drawdowns

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5SPY.L drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than 3USL.L's maximum drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5SPY.L and 3USL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5SPY.L3USL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.86%

-76.72%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.76%

-25.29%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.55%

-48.69%

-23.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-1.82%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.64%

-15.26%

-35.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.64%

6.31%

+6.33%

Volatility

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long US 500 ETP Securities (5SPY.L) has a higher volatility of 15.12% compared to WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) at 9.42%. This indicates that 5SPY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5SPY.L3USL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.12%

9.42%

+5.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.00%

25.26%

+14.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.20%

34.36%

+20.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.23%

47.39%

+30.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.23%

48.51%

+29.72%

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 5SPY.L and 3USL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

5SPY.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5SPY.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, 5SPY.L and 3USL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5SPY.L and 3USL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5SPY.L and 3USL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer