5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L
5QQQ.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities) and QYLU.L (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. 5QQQ.L is actively managed, while QYLU.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 5QQQ.L returned 35.36%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for QYLU.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 5QQQ.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QYLU.L.
Performance
5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
5QQQ.L is traded in GBp, while QYLU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 5QQQ.L achieves a 21.95% return, which is significantly higher than QYLU.L's 5.02% return.
5QQQ.L
- 1D
- -10.98%
- 1M
- -28.94%
- 6M
- 19.94%
- YTD
- 21.95%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 35.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLU.L
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- 16.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5QQQ.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities | 21.95% | -4.78% | 76.84% | 401.35% | -38.49% |
QYLU.L Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 5.02% | -1.93% | 25.08% | 16.46% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between 5QQQ.L and QYLU.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between 5QQQ.L and QYLU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L — Risk / Return Rank
5QQQ.L
QYLU.L
5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 5QQQ.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 3.36 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 9.90 | -7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 5QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, which is greater than QYLU.L's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQQ.L and QYLU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 5QQQ.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.97% | -22.59% | -73.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.68% | -4.80% | -51.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.23% | -22.59% | -57.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.51% | -4.80% | -51.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.79% | -4.77% | -69.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.74% | 1.63% | +21.11% |
Volatility
5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) has a higher volatility of 31.30% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L) at 5.47%. This indicates that 5QQQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 5QQQ.L | QYLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.30% | 5.47% | +25.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.87% | 10.10% | +57.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.51% | 14.10% | +71.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.62% | 16.17% | +87.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.62% | 16.17% | +87.45% |
5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
5QQQ.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLU.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
5QQQ.L vs. QYLU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 5QQQ.L nor QYLU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
5QQQ.L and QYLU.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QYLU.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QYLU.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5QQQ.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5QQQ.L and 0.45% for QYLU.L.
Find the right allocation for 5QQQ.L and QYLU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer