5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

5QQQ.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities) and 3ABN.L (Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - 5QQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while 3ABN.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index. 5QQQ.L is actively managed, while 3ABN.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 5QQQ.L returned 69.87%/yr vs 312.05%/yr for 3ABN.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5QQQ.L achieves a 92.08% return, which is significantly higher than 3ABN.L's -17.48% return.

5QQQ.L

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: 46.02%
• YTD: 92.08%
• 6M: 79.80%
• 1Y: 213.52%
• 3Y*: 69.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3ABN.L

• 1D: 7.63%
• 1M: -8.56%
• YTD: -17.48%
• 6M: 18.31%
• 1Y: -30.56%
• 3Y*: 312.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
5QQQ.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities	92.08%	-4.78%	76.82%	401.38%	-95.59%	15.05%
3ABN.L Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP	-17.48%	12,760.97%	-45.97%	106.32%	-96.11%	3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between 5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021	0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between 5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	5QQQ.L	3ABN.L
Technology	54.2%	-
Communication Services	15.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5QQQ.L

5QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
5QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
5QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
5QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
5QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
5QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	5QQQ.L	3ABN.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	-0.36	+2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	0.01	+2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.00	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	-0.54	+3.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	-0.81	+8.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the 3ABN.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	5QQQ.L	3ABN.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	-0.36	+2.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.00	-0.04

Drawdowns

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, roughly equal to the maximum 3ABN.L drawdown of -99.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	5QQQ.L	3ABN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.97%	-99.20%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.48%	-56.74%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-80.23%	-88.24%	+8.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.50%	-39.50%	+8.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.65%	-72.43%	-2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.40%	37.50%	-10.10%

Volatility

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) is 23.67%, while Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) has a volatility of 25.65%. This indicates that 5QQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3ABN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	5QQQ.L	3ABN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.67%	25.65%	-1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.95%	68.67%	-11.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.96%	85.59%	+3.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.45%	9,929.19%	-9,823.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	105.45%	9,929.19%	-9,823.74%

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

5QQQ.L vs. 3ABN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5QQQ.L nor 3ABN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L in my portfolio?

5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 5QQQ.L or 3ABN.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 5QQQ.L or 3ABN.L?

5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

What is the main difference between 5QQQ.L and 3ABN.L?

5QQQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while 3ABN.L is Leveraged Equities.