PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5MVL.DE achieves a 31.38% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's 5.55% return.


5MVL.DE

1D
-1.68%
1M
-10.88%
6M
21.28%
YTD
31.38%
1Y
52.96%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*

XDWH.DE

1D
0.44%
1M
6.83%
6M
3.32%
YTD
5.55%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
31.38%27.25%21.00%14.59%-10.56%13.09%-2.40%20.36%-14.02%
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
5.55%2.20%7.45%0.04%0.11%30.30%2.70%27.21%-7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between 5MVL.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between 5MVL.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5MVL.DE
5MVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.DE
XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


5MVL.DEXDWH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

2.10

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.22

5.39

+7.83

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5MVL.DE and XDWH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5MVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.22%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5MVL.DE and XDWH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5MVL.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.22%

-40.65%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-9.82%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-21.11%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.60%

-21.11%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.68%

-1.89%

-11.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-7.33%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.83%

+0.16%

Volatility

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.99%. This indicates that 5MVL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5MVL.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

4.99%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.39%

10.40%

+8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.29%

14.26%

+8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

13.58%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

15.65%

+3.94%

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5MVL.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

5MVL.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5MVL.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5MVL.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.

5MVL.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. 5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 5MVL.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5MVL.DE and XDWH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer