5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

5HEP.L (Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)) and BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Natixis and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 5HEP.L returned 3.50%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for BBSU.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 5HEP.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBSU.L.

Performance

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5HEP.L achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than BBSU.L's 10.31% return.

5HEP.L

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: -0.99%
• 6M: -0.29%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 1.62%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: —

BBSU.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 6M: 9.48%
• 1Y: 28.45%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
5HEP.L Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)	-0.99%	-2.61%	5.42%	9.48%	-6.21%	23.62%	19.82%	11.79%
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)	10.31%	9.39%	27.19%	20.71%	-10.46%	29.25%	16.07%	11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between 5HEP.L and BBSU.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between 5HEP.L and BBSU.L has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HEP.L

5HEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
5HEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
5HEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
5HEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
5HEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BBSU.L

BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	5HEP.L	BBSU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	2.70	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	3.60	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.50	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	3.65	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	12.74	-10.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5HEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5HEP.L and BBSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	5HEP.L	BBSU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63	2.70	-2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	1.00	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.96	-0.44

Drawdowns

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5HEP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.16%, smaller than the maximum BBSU.L drawdown of -25.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5HEP.L and BBSU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	5HEP.L	BBSU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.16%	-25.80%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.77%	-7.80%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	-21.42%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.08%	-21.42%	+2.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.21%	-0.17%	-8.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-3.72%	-1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	2.24%	+0.85%

Volatility

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L - Volatility Comparison

Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HEP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) at 2.64%. This indicates that 5HEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	5HEP.L	BBSU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.64%	2.64%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.56%	7.21%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.42%	10.54%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	14.45%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	16.10%	-0.08%

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HEP.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

5HEP.L vs. BBSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HEP.L nor BBSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 5HEP.L and BBSU.L in my portfolio?

5HEP.L and BBSU.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 5HEP.L or BBSU.L?

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 5HEP.L or BBSU.L?

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HEP.L.

What is the main difference between 5HEP.L and BBSU.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HEP.L and 0.05% for BBSU.L.