5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

5HED.DE (Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)) and XZMD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - 5HED.DE tracks the Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector while XZMD.DE tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 5HED.DE returned 4.27%/yr vs 21.97%/yr for XZMD.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 5HED.DE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XZMD.DE.

Performance

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

5HED.DE is traded in USD, while XZMD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XZMD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5HED.DE achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than XZMD.DE's 7.01% return.

5HED.DE

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: -1.48%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 5.74%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: 2.39%
• 10Y*: —

XZMD.DE

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 2.72%
• YTD: 7.01%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 21.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
5HED.DE Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)	-1.48%	4.29%	4.19%	16.05%	-8.33%
XZMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D	7.01%	18.59%	25.04%	30.55%	-9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between 5HED.DE and XZMD.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between 5HED.DE and XZMD.DE has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HED.DE

5HED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 16
5HED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
5HED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
5HED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 15
5HED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
5HED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

XZMD.DE

XZMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 51
XZMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
XZMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
XZMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XZMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
XZMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	5HED.DE	XZMD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	2.00	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.89	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.35	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	2.07	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	8.14	-6.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5HED.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the XZMD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5HED.DE and XZMD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	5HED.DE	XZMD.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	2.00	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.99	-0.52

Drawdowns

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5HED.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.82%, which is greater than XZMD.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5HED.DE and XZMD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	5HED.DE	XZMD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.82%	-21.05%	-11.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-12.30%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.34%	-21.05%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.37%	-0.52%	-5.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-3.85%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	3.14%	+0.20%

Volatility

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) at 3.39%. This indicates that 5HED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZMD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	5HED.DE	XZMD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	3.39%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.71%	9.32%	-0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.74%	12.73%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.01%	16.72%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.62%	16.72%	+0.90%

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HED.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XZMD.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

5HED.DE vs. XZMD.DE - Dividend Comparison

5HED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XZMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
5HED.DE Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XZMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D	0.68%	0.81%	0.91%	0.97%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 5HED.DE and XZMD.DE in my portfolio?

5HED.DE and XZMD.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 5HED.DE or XZMD.DE?

On fees, XZMD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 5HED.DE or XZMD.DE?

XZMD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HED.DE.

What is the main difference between 5HED.DE and XZMD.DE?

5HED.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector, while XZMD.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HED.DE and 0.15% for XZMD.DE.