PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and WisdomTree US Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WTEF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5HED.DE is traded in USD, while WTEF.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WTEF.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5HED.DE achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than WTEF.DE's 8.23% return.


5HED.DE

1D
1.38%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*

WTEF.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.75%
YTD
8.23%
6M
9.59%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 5HED.DE and WTEF.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023

0.51

The correlation between 5HED.DE and WTEF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HED.DE
5HED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
5HED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
5HED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

WTEF.DE
WTEF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WTEF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTEF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTEF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
WTEF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTEF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and WisdomTree US Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WTEF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5HED.DEWTEF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

2.51

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

11.52

-9.92

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5HED.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the WTEF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5HED.DE and WTEF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5HED.DEWTEF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

1.81

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.50

-1.03

Drawdowns

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5HED.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.82%, which is greater than WTEF.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5HED.DE and WTEF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5HED.DEWTEF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.82%

-18.59%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-9.53%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.37%

-0.68%

-5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-2.01%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.09%

+1.25%

Volatility

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) is 4.08%, while WisdomTree US Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WTEF.DE) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that 5HED.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTEF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5HED.DEWTEF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.40%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

10.20%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

13.24%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

14.87%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

14.87%

+2.75%

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5HED.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WTEF.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

5HED.DE vs. WTEF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5HED.DE nor WTEF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5HED.DE and WTEF.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WTEF.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WTEF.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HED.DE.

5HED.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector, while WTEF.DE tracks WisdomTree US Efficient Core UCITS. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HED.DE and 0.20% for WTEF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5HED.DE and WTEF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer