5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE
5HED.DE (Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD)) and EDMU.DE (iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - 5HED.DE tracks the Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector while EDMU.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 5HED.DE returned 2.39%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for EDMU.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 5HED.DE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for EDMU.DE.
Performance
5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
5HED.DE is traded in USD, while EDMU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EDMU.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 5HED.DE achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than EDMU.DE's 9.11% return.
5HED.DE
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 5.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- —
EDMU.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- —
5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5HED.DE Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) | -1.48% | 4.29% | 4.19% | 16.05% | -16.59% | 22.07% | 23.80% | 11.81% |
EDMU.DE iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc | 9.11% | 15.87% | 23.62% | 25.91% | -21.90% | 28.01% | 21.73% | 13.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between 5HED.DE and EDMU.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between 5HED.DE and EDMU.DE has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
5HED.DE
EDMU.DE
5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 5HED.DE | EDMU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.37 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 2.68 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 10.97 | -9.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 5HED.DE | EDMU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 2.12 | -1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.71 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 5HED.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.82%, roughly equal to the maximum EDMU.DE drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5HED.DE and EDMU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 5HED.DE | EDMU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.82% | -33.91% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -9.47% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -20.26% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -27.13% | +5.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.37% | -0.58% | -5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -6.01% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.31% | +1.03% |
Volatility
5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Volatility Comparison
Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF 1A (USD) (5HED.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) at 2.87%. This indicates that 5HED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDMU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 5HED.DE | EDMU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 2.87% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.71% | 8.39% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.74% | 11.95% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 16.34% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 18.03% | -0.41% |
5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
5HED.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EDMU.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
5HED.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 5HED.DE nor EDMU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
5HED.DE and EDMU.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDMU.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5HED.DE.
5HED.DE tracks Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector, while EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5HED.DE and 0.07% for EDMU.DE.
Find the right allocation for 5HED.DE and EDMU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer