PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5ESG.L is traded in GBp, while SPLW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPLW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5ESG.L achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPLW.L's 1.40% return.


5ESG.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.76%
YTD
9.48%
6M
10.78%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*

SPLW.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
1.40%
6M
0.83%
1Y
1.38%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
9.48%18.26%23.62%26.17%-20.24%10.85%
SPLW.L
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc
1.40%-2.66%15.44%-5.47%7.10%13.08%

Correlation

The correlation between 5ESG.L and SPLW.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.23

The correlation between 5ESG.L and SPLW.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
5ESG.L
SPLW.L

Technology

38.6%
4.6%

Communication Services

14.5%
0.8%

Financial Services

12.0%
16.6%

Healthcare

9.3%
6.8%

Industrials

6.8%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
5.7%

Energy

4.2%
0.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
14.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.0%

Utilities

0.8%
26.8%

Technology

5ESG.L
38.6%
SPLW.L
4.6%

Communication Services

5ESG.L
14.5%
SPLW.L
0.8%

Financial Services

5ESG.L
12.0%
SPLW.L
16.6%

Healthcare

5ESG.L
9.3%
SPLW.L
6.8%

Industrials

5ESG.L
6.8%
SPLW.L
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

5ESG.L
5.1%
SPLW.L
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5ESG.L
4.6%
SPLW.L
5.7%

Energy

5ESG.L
4.2%
SPLW.L
0.9%

Real Estate

5ESG.L
2.2%
SPLW.L
14.8%

Basic Materials

5ESG.L
1.9%
SPLW.L
2.0%

Utilities

5ESG.L
0.8%
SPLW.L
26.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5ESG.L
5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLW.L
SPLW.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SPLW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5ESG.LSPLW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.03

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

0.18

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

0.45

+14.20

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the SPLW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5ESG.L and SPLW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5ESG.LSPLW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

0.12

+2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.43

+0.62

Drawdowns

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5ESG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.50%, which is greater than SPLW.L's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5ESG.L and SPLW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5ESG.LSPLW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.50%

-14.28%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-7.56%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-10.82%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-7.04%

+6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-5.84%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.03%

-0.98%

Volatility

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) is 3.46%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that 5ESG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5ESG.LSPLW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.98%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

8.70%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

11.19%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

12.99%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

12.99%

+6.14%

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5ESG.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Dividend Comparison

5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while SPLW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
0.62%0.87%0.47%1.07%1.32%0.89%1.25%0.39%
SPLW.L
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


5ESG.L and SPLW.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLW.L.

5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while SPLW.L tracks S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for 5ESG.L and 0.25% for SPLW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5ESG.L and SPLW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer