5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L
5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) and SPLW.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - 5ESG.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index while SPLW.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 5ESG.L returned 21.08%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for SPLW.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 5ESG.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLW.L.
Performance
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
5ESG.L is traded in GBp, while SPLW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPLW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 5ESG.L achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPLW.L's 1.40% return.
5ESG.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SPLW.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 9.48% | 18.26% | 23.62% | 26.17% | -20.24% | 10.85% |
SPLW.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc | 1.40% | -2.66% | 15.44% | -5.47% | 7.10% | 13.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between 5ESG.L and SPLW.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between 5ESG.L and SPLW.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Communication Services
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Financial Services
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Healthcare
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Industrials
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Defensive
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Cyclical
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Energy
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Real Estate
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Basic Materials
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Utilities
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L — Risk / Return Rank
5ESG.L
SPLW.L
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 5ESG.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.03 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 0.18 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.65 | 0.45 | +14.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 5ESG.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 0.12 | +2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.43 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 5ESG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.50%, which is greater than SPLW.L's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5ESG.L and SPLW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 5ESG.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.50% | -14.28% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -7.56% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -10.82% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -7.04% | +6.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -5.84% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 3.03% | -0.98% |
Volatility
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) is 3.46%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that 5ESG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 5ESG.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.98% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 8.70% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 11.19% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 12.99% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 12.99% | +6.14% |
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
5ESG.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
5ESG.L vs. SPLW.L - Dividend Comparison
5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while SPLW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 0.62% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.39% |
SPLW.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
5ESG.L and SPLW.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLW.L.
5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while SPLW.L tracks S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for 5ESG.L and 0.25% for SPLW.L.
Find the right allocation for 5ESG.L and SPLW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer