500U.L vs. SPXP.L
500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 500U.L returned 15.69%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 500U.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
500U.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
500U.L is traded in USD, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 500U.L having a 10.41% return and SPXP.L slightly lower at 10.29%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with 500U.L having a 15.69% annualized return and SPXP.L not far behind at 15.49%.
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
500U.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.41% | 17.98% | 24.83% | 26.85% | -19.06% | 30.19% | 18.05% | 32.02% | -5.58% | 21.10% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.29% | 17.79% | 25.46% | 26.40% | -18.54% | 30.07% | 17.39% | 31.85% | -5.42% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between 500U.L and SPXP.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014 | 0.75 |
The correlation between 500U.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
500U.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
500U.L
SPXP.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
500U.L
SPXP.L
Financial Services
500U.L
SPXP.L
Communication Services
500U.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
500U.L
SPXP.L
Healthcare
500U.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
500U.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
500U.L
SPXP.L
Energy
500U.L
SPXP.L
Utilities
500U.L
SPXP.L
Real Estate
500U.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
500U.L
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
500U.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
500U.L
SPXP.L
500U.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 500U.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.46 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.23 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | 13.97 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 500U.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.53 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.90 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | 1.01 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.96 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
500U.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 500U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500U.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 500U.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -33.47% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -8.65% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.29% | -18.72% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -25.04% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -33.47% | -0.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.52% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -4.48% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.00% | -0.09% |
Volatility
500U.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.60%. This indicates that 500U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 500U.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 2.60% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 8.02% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 11.02% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 15.57% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 16.75% | +1.51% |
500U.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
500U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
500U.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 500U.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, 500U.L and SPXP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500U.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for 500U.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer