500U.L vs. 3USL.L
500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) and 3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) are both exchange-traded funds - 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while 3USL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 500U.L returned 15.69%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for 3USL.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 500U.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3USL.L.
Performance
500U.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 500U.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 25.13% return. Over the past 10 years, 500U.L has underperformed 3USL.L with an annualized return of 15.69%, while 3USL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
3USL.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 8.78%
- YTD
- 25.13%
- 6M
- 25.16%
- 1Y
- 76.37%
- 3Y*
- 50.50%
- 5Y*
- 22.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
500U.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.41% | 17.98% | 24.83% | 26.85% | -19.06% | 30.19% | 18.05% | 32.02% | -5.58% | 21.10% |
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 25.13% | 28.97% | 64.00% | 70.49% | -57.35% | 101.77% | 7.89% | 97.98% | -27.34% | 69.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between 500U.L and 3USL.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, 500U.L and 3USL.L have become more correlated (1.00) than their long-term average of 0.75, meaning their price movements have been converging.
500U.L vs. 3USL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
500U.L
3USL.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
500U.L
3USL.L
Financial Services
500U.L
3USL.L
Communication Services
500U.L
3USL.L
Consumer Cyclical
500U.L
3USL.L
Healthcare
500U.L
3USL.L
Industrials
500U.L
3USL.L
Consumer Defensive
500U.L
3USL.L
Energy
500U.L
3USL.L
Utilities
500U.L
3USL.L
Real Estate
500U.L
3USL.L
Basic Materials
500U.L
3USL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
500U.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank
500U.L
3USL.L
500U.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 500U.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.36 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.06 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | 12.28 | +2.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 500U.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.25 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.47 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.12 | 0.59 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.60 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
500U.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 500U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500U.L and 3USL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 500U.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -76.72% | +42.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -25.29% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.29% | -48.69% | +30.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -63.47% | +39.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -76.72% | +42.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.82% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -15.26% | +10.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 6.31% | -4.40% |
Volatility
500U.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) is 3.21%, while WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that 500U.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 500U.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 9.42% | -6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 25.26% | -16.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 34.36% | -22.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 47.39% | -31.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 48.51% | -30.25% |
500U.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
500U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
500U.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 500U.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, 500U.L and 3USL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 500U.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
500U.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
500U.L is categorized as S&P 500, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500U.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.
Find the right allocation for 500U.L and 3USL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer