PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
500D.L vs. XEWG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

500D.L vs. XEWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

500D.L is traded in USD, while XEWG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XEWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 500D.L achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than XEWG.L's 8.49% return.


500D.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.40%
6M
11.15%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
10Y*

XEWG.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.48%
YTD
8.49%
6M
10.77%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

500D.L vs. XEWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
500D.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist
10.40%17.37%25.36%26.84%-18.54%1.87%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged
8.49%19.45%9.80%17.77%-23.26%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between 500D.L and XEWG.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.79

The correlation between 500D.L and XEWG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

500D.L vs. XEWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

500D.L
500D.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
500D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
500D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XEWG.L
XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

500D.L vs. XEWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


500D.LXEWG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.91

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

6.27

+8.34

500D.L vs. XEWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 500D.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 500D.L and XEWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


500D.LXEWG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.32

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.28

+0.49

Drawdowns

500D.L vs. XEWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 500D.L drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, smaller than the maximum XEWG.L drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500D.L and XEWG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


500D.LXEWG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.21%

-38.44%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-9.65%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-18.75%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.32%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-11.03%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.95%

-1.04%

Volatility

500D.L vs. XEWG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L) is 3.20%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that 500D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


500D.LXEWG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.52%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

9.78%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

13.99%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

21.08%

-4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

21.08%

-4.69%

500D.L vs. XEWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

500D.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XEWG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

500D.L vs. XEWG.L - Dividend Comparison

500D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than XEWG.L's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
500D.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.82%0.90%1.17%0.93%1.44%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged
1.19%1.25%1.50%1.24%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


500D.L and XEWG.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 500D.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

500D.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XEWG.L.

500D.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500D.L and 0.30% for XEWG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 500D.L and XEWG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer