PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
500D.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

500D.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

500D.L is traded in USD, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 500D.L having a 10.40% return and SPXP.L slightly lower at 10.28%.


500D.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.40%
6M
11.15%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
10Y*

SPXP.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.64%
YTD
10.28%
6M
11.31%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

500D.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
500D.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist
10.40%17.37%25.36%26.84%-18.54%1.87%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.28%17.79%25.46%26.40%-18.54%2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between 500D.L and SPXP.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.93

The correlation between 500D.L and SPXP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

500D.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

500D.L
500D.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
500D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
500D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

500D.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


500D.LSPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.23

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

13.97

+0.65

500D.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 500D.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 500D.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


500D.LSPXP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.53

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.96

-0.19

Drawdowns

500D.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 500D.L drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, smaller than the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 500D.L and SPXP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


500D.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.21%

-33.47%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-8.65%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-18.72%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.52%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-4.48%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.00%

-0.09%

Volatility

500D.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (500D.L) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.60%. This indicates that 500D.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


500D.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

2.60%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

8.02%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

11.02%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

15.57%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

16.75%

-0.36%

500D.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

500D.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

500D.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

500D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
500D.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.82%0.90%1.17%0.93%1.44%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, 500D.L and SPXP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500D.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 500D.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 500D.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer