4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE
4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) and CNUA.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG, while CNUA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 4UBQ.DE returned 14.96%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for CNUA.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 4UBQ.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CNUA.DE.
Performance
4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4UBQ.DE achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly lower than CNUA.DE's 18.41% return.
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 29.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- —
CNUA.DE
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 18.41%
- 6M
- 19.60%
- 1Y
- 45.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 12.38% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 24.03% | -13.92% | 43.62% | 7.99% |
CNUA.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 18.41% | 15.18% | 24.15% | -14.62% | -18.77% | 18.43% | 7.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4UBQ.DE and CNUA.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2020 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
4UBQ.DE
CNUA.DE
4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 4UBQ.DE | CNUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.27 | 6.94 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.39 | 19.16 | -2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4UBQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, smaller than the maximum CNUA.DE drawdown of -37.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBQ.DE and CNUA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4UBQ.DE | CNUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.35% | -37.81% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -6.56% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.35% | -26.63% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -37.81% | +14.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.69% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -14.75% | +10.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 2.38% | -0.58% |
Volatility
4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) is 3.37%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that 4UBQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4UBQ.DE | CNUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 5.70% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 12.84% | -4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 17.95% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 23.18% | -7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 25.04% | -9.55% |
4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
4UBQ.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CNUA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
4UBQ.DE vs. CNUA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4UBQ.DE nor CNUA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
4UBQ.DE and CNUA.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CNUA.DE.
4UBQ.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while CNUA.DE is China Equities. 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while CNUA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE and 0.30% for CNUA.DE.
Find the right allocation for 4UBQ.DE and CNUA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer