4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE
4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) and 2B7C.DE (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG, while 2B7C.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 4UBQ.DE returned 15.51%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for 2B7C.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 4UBQ.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 2B7C.DE.
Performance
4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4UBQ.DE achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7C.DE's 13.30% return.
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.51%
- 10Y*
- —
2B7C.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.15% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 24.03% | -13.92% | 43.62% | 8.66% |
2B7C.DE iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 13.30% | 6.91% | 23.72% | 13.89% | -0.20% | 32.19% | 20.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4UBQ.DE and 2B7C.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between 4UBQ.DE and 2B7C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
4UBQ.DE
2B7C.DE
4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 4UBQ.DE | 2B7C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.26 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 2.34 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.73 | 7.59 | +8.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 4UBQ.DE | 2B7C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 1.44 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.78 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.60 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4UBQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.35%, smaller than the maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown of -41.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBQ.DE and 2B7C.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4UBQ.DE | 2B7C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.35% | -41.33% | +17.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -8.89% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.35% | -22.66% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -22.66% | -0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.47% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -5.04% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 2.75% | -0.94% |
Volatility
4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) is 2.81%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that 4UBQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4UBQ.DE | 2B7C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 3.74% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 10.98% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.53% | 14.45% | -2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 16.73% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 19.35% | -3.96% |
4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
4UBQ.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
4UBQ.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4UBQ.DE nor 2B7C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
4UBQ.DE and 2B7C.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7C.DE.
4UBQ.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while 2B7C.DE is Industrials Equities. 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while 2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE and 0.15% for 2B7C.DE.
Find the right allocation for 4UBQ.DE and 2B7C.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer