4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE
4UBP.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and UETW.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 4UBP.DE is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond, while UETW.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 4UBP.DE returned 0.76%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for UETW.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 4UBP.DE charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for UETW.DE.
Performance
4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4UBP.DE achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than UETW.DE's 10.95% return.
4UBP.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
UETW.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4UBP.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.25% | -2.18% | 6.73% | 5.80% | -13.17% | 3.83% | -2.06% |
UETW.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 10.95% | 8.06% | 26.50% | 19.68% | -13.72% | 32.17% | 14.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4UBP.DE and UETW.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020 | 0.24 |
The correlation between 4UBP.DE and UETW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
4UBP.DE
UETW.DE
4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 4UBP.DE | UETW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.40 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.67 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 14.61 | -11.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 4UBP.DE | UETW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 2.17 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.91 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.85 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4UBP.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum UETW.DE drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBP.DE and UETW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4UBP.DE | UETW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -33.72% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.21% | -6.47% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.60% | -21.30% | +12.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | -21.30% | +6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -0.30% | -3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -4.63% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.63% | -0.67% |
Volatility
4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) is 1.09%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETW.DE) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that 4UBP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UETW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4UBP.DE | UETW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 2.60% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.00% | 7.63% | -4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 10.97% | -6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 14.03% | -7.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 16.11% | -9.67% |
4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
4UBP.DE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than UETW.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
4UBP.DE vs. UETW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4UBP.DE nor UETW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
4UBP.DE and UETW.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UETW.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UETW.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for 4UBP.DE.
4UBP.DE is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while UETW.DE is Global Equities. 4UBP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond, while UETW.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for 4UBP.DE and 0.10% for UETW.DE.
Find the right allocation for 4UBP.DE and UETW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer