PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4UBP.DE achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than 36B7.DE's -0.71% return.


4UBP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.30%
YTD
1.94%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.24%

36B7.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.71%
1Y
1.67%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
-1.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
4UBP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
1.94%-2.18%6.73%5.80%-13.17%3.83%-2.94%
36B7.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
-0.71%4.83%1.72%6.08%-16.05%-1.91%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between 4UBP.DE and 36B7.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.53

The correlation between 4UBP.DE and 36B7.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4UBP.DE
4UBP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
4UBP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

36B7.DE
36B7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
36B7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


4UBP.DE36B7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.08

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

0.59

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

1.67

-1.30

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4UBP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the 36B7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4UBP.DE and 36B7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4UBP.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.61%, smaller than the maximum 36B7.DE drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBP.DE and 36B7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4UBP.DE36B7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.61%

-21.83%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-2.81%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-4.56%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.61%

-21.62%

+6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.14%

-7.86%

-5.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-8.34%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.03%

1.00%

+11.03%

Volatility

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE) at 1.03%. This indicates that 4UBP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36B7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4UBP.DE36B7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

1.03%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

3.23%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.68%

4.15%

+17.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.47%

5.70%

+5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.62%

6.46%

+4.16%

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4UBP.DE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than 36B7.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

4UBP.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Dividend Comparison

4UBP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36B7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B7.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
4.12%4.01%3.87%3.23%2.71%2.07%1.19%0.94%
4UBP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


4UBP.DE and 36B7.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBP.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBP.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for 36B7.DE.

4UBP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond, while 36B7.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Bond Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for 4UBP.DE and 0.25% for 36B7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4UBP.DE and 36B7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer