PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBI.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


4UBI.DE

1D
-0.66%
1M
8.11%
YTD
14.39%
6M
13.96%
1Y
23.75%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*

LCUS.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
4UBI.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
14.39%-1.05%26.19%28.05%-21.21%43.58%18.50%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%3.40%32.87%22.96%-15.87%37.82%18.14%

Correlation

The correlation between 4UBI.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2020

0.82

The correlation between 4UBI.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4UBI.DE
4UBI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
4UBI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBI.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


4UBI.DELCUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


4UBI.DELCUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

Drawdowns

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4UBI.DELCUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.95%

Volatility

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4UBI.DELCUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4UBI.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

4UBI.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 4UBI.DE nor LCUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
4UBI.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.84%0.78%2.27%1.12%1.52%1.10%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


4UBI.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for 4UBI.DE.

4UBI.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for 4UBI.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4UBI.DE and LCUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer