PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4UBF.DE achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBP.DE's 1.25% return.


4UBF.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.31%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*

4UBP.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
1.06%
YTD
1.25%
6M
0.67%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 4UBF.DE and 4UBP.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2021

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between 4UBF.DE and 4UBP.DE has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4UBF.DE
4UBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBP.DE
4UBP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
4UBP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


4UBF.DE4UBP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.12

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.29

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

2.97

-0.67

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the 4UBP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4UBF.DE and 4UBP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


4UBF.DE4UBP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.66

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.11

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

-0.03

-0.01

Drawdowns

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4UBF.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, which is greater than 4UBP.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4UBF.DE and 4UBP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4UBF.DE4UBP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-15.13%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-2.21%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.88%

-8.60%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.99%

-15.13%

-4.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-4.00%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-6.74%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.96%

-0.09%

Volatility

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) at 1.09%. This indicates that 4UBF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4UBF.DE4UBP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.09%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

3.00%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

4.31%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.08%

6.54%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

6.44%

-1.42%

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 4UBF.DE and 4UBP.DE have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

4UBF.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 4UBF.DE nor 4UBP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


4UBF.DE and 4UBP.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBF.DE and 4UBP.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.

4UBF.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while 4UBP.DE is Global Corporate Bonds. 4UBF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable, while 4UBP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4UBF.DE and 4UBP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer