PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than VJPN.DE's 15.87% return.


4GLD.DE

1D
2.93%
1M
-9.21%
YTD
-2.63%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*
12.28%

VJPN.DE

1D
2.24%
1M
0.92%
YTD
15.87%
6M
16.47%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
-2.63%49.32%34.57%9.33%7.12%4.03%13.03%21.27%3.19%-0.03%
VJPN.DE
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
15.87%13.29%13.05%15.88%-11.56%9.49%4.96%21.66%-10.15%0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between 4GLD.DE and VJPN.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.08

The correlation between 4GLD.DE and VJPN.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VJPN.DE
VJPN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VJPN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


4GLD.DEVJPN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

3.19

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

10.64

-7.23

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the VJPN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4GLD.DE and VJPN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than VJPN.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and VJPN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4GLD.DEVJPN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-28.35%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.73%

-9.71%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.73%

-16.02%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

-18.85%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.44%

-0.90%

-18.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-5.83%

-6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.11%

2.92%

+4.19%

Volatility

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.DE) at 4.29%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4GLD.DEVJPN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

4.29%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

14.84%

+5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.70%

18.36%

+5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

16.24%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

16.85%

-2.29%

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPN.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

4GLD.DE vs. VJPN.DE - Dividend Comparison

4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VJPN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VJPN.DE
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.67%1.91%1.93%1.91%2.22%1.66%1.62%1.80%1.94%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


4GLD.DE and VJPN.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPN.DE.

4GLD.DE is categorized as Gold, while VJPN.DE is Japan Equities. 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price, while VJPN.DE tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Börse Commodities and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for 4GLD.DE and 0.15% for VJPN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and VJPN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer