4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE
4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 4GLD.DE returned 23.16% vs 55.17% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 4GLD.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QUTM.DE.
Performance
4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 26.79% return.
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 26.79%
- 6M
- 26.44%
- 1Y
- 55.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | -2.63% | 26.41% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 26.79% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
4GLD.DE
QUTM.DE
4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 4GLD.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.04 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 5.00 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4GLD.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -24.77% | -12.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.73% | -24.77% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.44% | -9.00% | -10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -7.74% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.11% | 10.14% | -3.03% |
Volatility
4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) is 6.93%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 14.21%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4GLD.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 14.21% | -7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 24.16% | -3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.70% | 33.44% | -9.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 33.06% | -16.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 33.06% | -18.50% |
4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
4GLD.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4GLD.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
4GLD.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
4GLD.DE is categorized as Gold, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Börse Commodities and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for 4GLD.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer