4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE
4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) and NUKL.DE (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while NUKL.DE is a Uranium fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 4GLD.DE returned 26.47%/yr vs 41.91%/yr for NUKL.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 4GLD.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for NUKL.DE.
Performance
4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than NUKL.DE's 11.67% return.
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
NUKL.DE
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 37.72%
- 3Y*
- 41.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | -2.63% | 49.32% | 34.57% | 6.15% |
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A | 11.67% | 51.50% | 38.03% | 23.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and NUKL.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023 | 0.21 |
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and NUKL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
4GLD.DE
NUKL.DE
4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 4GLD.DE | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 1.86 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 4.43 | -1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NUKL.DE drawdown of -37.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and NUKL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4GLD.DE | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -37.52% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.73% | -27.12% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | -37.52% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.44% | -12.83% | -6.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -7.79% | -4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.11% | 11.43% | -4.32% |
Volatility
4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) is 6.93%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a volatility of 11.05%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4GLD.DE | NUKL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 11.05% | -4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 28.97% | -8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.70% | 41.82% | -18.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 34.22% | -17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 34.22% | -19.66% |
4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKL.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
4GLD.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4GLD.DE nor NUKL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
4GLD.DE and NUKL.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.
4GLD.DE is categorized as Gold, while NUKL.DE is Uranium. 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price, while NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Börse Commodities and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for 4GLD.DE and 0.55% for NUKL.DE.
Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and NUKL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer