4GLD.DE vs. FCX
4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while FCX (Freeport-McMoRan Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, 4GLD.DE returned 12.28%/yr vs 21.73%/yr for FCX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
4GLD.DE vs. FCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
4GLD.DE is traded in EUR, while FCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FCX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than FCX's 37.41% return. Over the past 10 years, 4GLD.DE has underperformed FCX with an annualized return of 12.28%, while FCX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.73% annualized return.
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
FCX
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 37.41%
- 6M
- 47.21%
- 1Y
- 68.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 21.73%
4GLD.DE vs. FCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | -2.63% | 49.32% | 34.57% | 9.33% | 7.12% | 4.03% | 13.03% | 21.27% | 3.19% | -1.67% |
FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 37.41% | 19.34% | -3.43% | 10.28% | -2.20% | 73.48% | 82.65% | 32.52% | -42.53% | 26.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and FCX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2009 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, 4GLD.DE and FCX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
4GLD.DE vs. FCX — Risk / Return Rank
4GLD.DE
FCX
4GLD.DE vs. FCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 4GLD.DE | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.79 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 7.24 | -3.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
4GLD.DE vs. FCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, smaller than the maximum FCX drawdown of -91.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and FCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4GLD.DE | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.79% | -91.04% | +54.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.73% | -24.65% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | -46.84% | +25.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.73% | -46.84% | +25.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.73% | -69.67% | +47.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.44% | -4.10% | -15.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -41.40% | +29.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.11% | 9.46% | -2.35% |
Volatility
4GLD.DE vs. FCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) is 6.93%, while Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 4GLD.DE | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 17.16% | -10.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 35.90% | -15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.70% | 47.02% | -23.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 43.19% | -26.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 47.50% | -32.94% |
Dividends
4GLD.DE vs. FCX - Dividend Comparison
4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 0.88% | 1.18% | 1.58% | 1.41% | 0.99% | 0.54% | 0.19% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
4GLD.DE and FCX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 4GLD.DE and FCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer