PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4COP.DE achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.DE's 30.36% return.


4COP.DE

1D
-3.07%
1M
-14.14%
6M
-7.51%
YTD
3.65%
1Y
73.88%
3Y*
24.85%
5Y*
10Y*

EMXC.DE

1D
-1.60%
1M
-12.60%
6M
21.10%
YTD
30.36%
1Y
49.32%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
4COP.DE
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
3.65%73.65%9.36%4.93%6.75%1.24%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
30.36%19.92%9.13%14.31%-13.59%0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between 4COP.DE and EMXC.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2021

0.55

The correlation between 4COP.DE and EMXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4COP.DE
4COP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


4COP.DEEMXC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.51

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

12.15

-4.62

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4COP.DE and EMXC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4COP.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.13%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC.DE drawdown of -40.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4COP.DE and EMXC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4COP.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.13%

-40.89%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.21%

-13.66%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.13%

-20.47%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.29%

-13.66%

-7.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.67%

-7.73%

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.85%

3.95%

+5.90%

Volatility

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.75% compared to Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) at 9.94%. This indicates that 4COP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4COP.DEEMXC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.75%

9.94%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.70%

20.82%

+14.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.04%

23.00%

+19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.60%

16.71%

+16.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.60%

19.20%

+14.40%

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

4COP.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

4COP.DE vs. EMXC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 4COP.DE nor EMXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


4COP.DE and EMXC.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for 4COP.DE.

4COP.DE is categorized as Copper, while EMXC.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. 4COP.DE tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index, while EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for 4COP.DE and 0.15% for EMXC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4COP.DE and EMXC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer