PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 4COP.DE achieves a 24.89% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's 0.78% return.


4COP.DE

1D
-0.93%
1M
15.31%
YTD
24.89%
6M
36.74%
1Y
112.94%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
10Y*

CSH.PA

1D
0.01%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.98%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
2.96%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
0.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
4COP.DE
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
24.89%73.62%9.38%4.93%6.78%1.33%
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.78%2.25%3.69%3.22%-0.06%-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between 4COP.DE and CSH.PA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2021

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

4COP.DE
4COP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
4COP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CSH.PA
CSH.PA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


4COP.DECSH.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.96

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

11.24

-6.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

57.34

-43.66

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 4COP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the CSH.PA Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 4COP.DE and CSH.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


4COP.DECSH.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

3.96

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

5.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.79

-0.05

Drawdowns

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 4COP.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -3.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4COP.DE and CSH.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


4COP.DECSH.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.12%

-3.73%

-35.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.21%

-0.18%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.12%

-0.18%

-38.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.17%

0.00%

-5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.66%

-1.04%

-13.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

0.03%

+8.19%

Volatility

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4COP.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.96% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 0.09%. This indicates that 4COP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


4COP.DECSH.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.96%

0.09%

+13.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.13%

0.41%

+32.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.63%

0.50%

+38.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.97%

0.35%

+32.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.97%

0.64%

+32.33%

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

4COP.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

4COP.DE vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither 4COP.DE nor CSH.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
4COP.DE
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSH.PA
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


4COP.DE and CSH.PA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for 4COP.DE.

4COP.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while CSH.PA is Money Market. 4COP.DE tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners v2 Index, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for 4COP.DE and 0.10% for CSH.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 4COP.DE and CSH.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer