3VT.L vs. TSLI.L
3VT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP) and TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3VT.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while TSLI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, 3VT.L returned 75.80% vs 46.40% for TSLI.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3VT.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSLI.L.
Performance
3VT.L vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3VT.L is traded in GBp, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3VT.L achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly higher than TSLI.L's -6.01% return.
3VT.L
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 30.70%
- 1Y
- 75.80%
- 3Y*
- 37.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLI.L
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- 46.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3VT.L vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3VT.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP | 27.78% | 28.59% | 10.28% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | -6.01% | 30.51% | 31.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3VT.L and TSLI.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3VT.L vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3VT.L
TSLI.L
3VT.L vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3VT.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.88 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 4.68 | +6.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3VT.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.24 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.71 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
3VT.L vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3VT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than TSLI.L's maximum drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3VT.L and TSLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3VT.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -43.88% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.47% | -24.61% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -11.95% | +10.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -13.75% | -11.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.02% | 9.84% | -2.82% |
Volatility
3VT.L vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) is 10.47%, while IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that 3VT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3VT.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 11.66% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 24.94% | +3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.37% | 37.48% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 42.95% | +4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 42.95% | +4.91% |
3VT.L vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3VT.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
3VT.L vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison
3VT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
3VT.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | 71.61% | 73.68% | 19.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3VT.L and TSLI.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3VT.L.
3VT.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3VT.L and 0.55% for TSLI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3VT.L and TSLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer