PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3VT.L vs. NVDI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3VT.L is traded in GBp, while NVDI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3VT.L achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly higher than NVDI.L's -0.06% return.


3VT.L

1D
-1.52%
1M
12.90%
YTD
27.78%
6M
30.70%
1Y
75.80%
3Y*
37.91%
5Y*
10Y*

NVDI.L

1D
-3.38%
1M
8.36%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
2.55%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3VT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP
27.78%28.59%3.92%
NVDI.L
IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP
-0.06%8.34%-4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between 3VT.L and NVDI.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.50

The correlation between 3VT.L and NVDI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3VT.L
3VT.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
3VT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3VT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
3VT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
3VT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
3VT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDI.L
NVDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NVDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3VT.LNVDI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.13

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

0.95

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

1.83

+8.94

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3VT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the NVDI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3VT.L and NVDI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3VT.LNVDI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

0.63

+1.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.05

+0.19

Drawdowns

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3VT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than NVDI.L's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3VT.L and NVDI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3VT.LNVDI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-33.89%

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.47%

-22.04%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-11.75%

+10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.23%

-11.82%

-13.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.02%

11.44%

-4.42%

Volatility

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP (NVDI.L) have volatilities of 10.47% and 10.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3VT.LNVDI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.47%

10.06%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

20.27%

+8.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.37%

33.12%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.86%

39.74%

+8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.86%

39.74%

+8.12%

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3VT.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

3VT.L vs. NVDI.L - Dividend Comparison

3VT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.63%.


PositionTTM20252024
3VT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDI.L
IncomeShares NVIDIA NVDA Options ETP
20.63%32.04%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


3VT.L and NVDI.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3VT.L.

3VT.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDI.L is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3VT.L and 0.55% for NVDI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3VT.L and NVDI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer