3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L
3VT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP) and 3TSM.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3VT.L is actively managed, while 3TSM.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3VT.L returned 37.91%/yr vs 140.10%/yr for 3TSM.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3VT.L is traded in GBp, while 3TSM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3TSM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3VT.L achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly lower than 3TSM.L's 143.29% return.
3VT.L
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 30.70%
- 1Y
- 75.80%
- 3Y*
- 37.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3TSM.L
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 32.09%
- YTD
- 143.29%
- 6M
- 152.77%
- 1Y
- 586.63%
- 3Y*
- 140.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3VT.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP | 27.78% | 28.59% | 32.38% | 43.18% | -49.57% | 0.00% |
3TSM.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities | 143.29% | 49.11% | 295.73% | 80.99% | -83.46% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3VT.L and 3TSM.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between 3VT.L and 3TSM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L — Risk / Return Rank
3VT.L
3TSM.L
3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3VT.L | 3TSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 12.83 | -9.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 36.76 | -25.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3VT.L | 3TSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 5.55 | -3.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.35 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3VT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, smaller than the maximum 3TSM.L drawdown of -92.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3VT.L and 3TSM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3VT.L | 3TSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -92.47% | +33.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.47% | -45.33% | +18.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.37% | -82.66% | +36.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -1.49% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -54.43% | +29.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.02% | 15.85% | -8.83% |
Volatility
3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) is 10.47%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) has a volatility of 37.64%. This indicates that 3VT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3TSM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3VT.L | 3TSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 37.64% | -27.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 76.94% | -48.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.37% | 104.95% | -68.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 113.18% | -65.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 113.18% | -65.32% |
3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3VT.L and 3TSM.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3VT.L vs. 3TSM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3VT.L nor 3TSM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3VT.L and 3TSM.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3VT.L and 3TSM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3VT.L and 3TSM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer