3VT.L vs. 2FB.L
3VT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP) and 2FB.L (Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3VT.L is actively managed, while 2FB.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3VT.L returned 37.91%/yr vs 36.09%/yr for 2FB.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3VT.L vs. 2FB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3VT.L achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly higher than 2FB.L's -21.96% return.
3VT.L
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 30.70%
- 1Y
- 75.80%
- 3Y*
- 37.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2FB.L
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -21.96%
- 6M
- -18.07%
- 1Y
- -30.62%
- 3Y*
- 36.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
3VT.L vs. 2FB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3VT.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP | 27.78% | 28.59% | 32.38% | 43.18% | -49.57% | 0.00% |
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -21.96% | -8.57% | 128.56% | 597.14% | -92.16% | 6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3VT.L and 2FB.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.50 |
The correlation between 3VT.L and 2FB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3VT.L vs. 2FB.L — Risk / Return Rank
3VT.L
2FB.L
3VT.L vs. 2FB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3VT.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.96 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | -0.51 | +3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | -0.94 | +11.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3VT.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | -0.46 | +2.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.07 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
3VT.L vs. 2FB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3VT.L drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, smaller than the maximum 2FB.L drawdown of -96.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3VT.L and 2FB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3VT.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -96.13% | +37.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.47% | -60.32% | +33.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.37% | -63.66% | +17.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -52.92% | +51.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.23% | -39.73% | +14.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.02% | 32.57% | -25.55% |
Volatility
3VT.L vs. 2FB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) is 10.47%, while Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) has a volatility of 13.78%. This indicates that 3VT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2FB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3VT.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 13.78% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 50.57% | -21.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.37% | 66.37% | -30.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 83.77% | -35.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 78.65% | -30.79% |
3VT.L vs. 2FB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3VT.L and 2FB.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3VT.L vs. 2FB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3VT.L nor 2FB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3VT.L and 2FB.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3VT.L and 2FB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3VT.L and 2FB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer