PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3USL.L achieves a 25.13% return, which is significantly higher than XS2D.L's 18.65% return. Over the past 10 years, 3USL.L has outperformed XS2D.L with an annualized return of 28.49%, while XS2D.L has yielded a comparatively lower 24.30% annualized return.


3USL.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
12.76%
YTD
25.13%
6M
26.49%
1Y
77.77%
3Y*
50.50%
5Y*
22.25%
10Y*
28.49%

XS2D.L

1D
0.01%
1M
8.78%
YTD
18.65%
6M
19.83%
1Y
53.75%
3Y*
38.35%
5Y*
20.41%
10Y*
24.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
3USL.L
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB
25.13%28.97%64.00%70.49%-57.35%101.77%7.89%97.98%-27.34%69.34%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
18.65%26.58%45.65%48.87%-39.09%63.03%20.96%62.86%-15.93%43.49%

Correlation

The correlation between 3USL.L and XS2D.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.99

The correlation between 3USL.L and XS2D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3USL.L
XS2D.L

Technology

36.9%
46.5%

Financial Services

12.6%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
0.7%

Communication Services

10.4%
14.0%

Healthcare

9.0%
11.8%

Industrials

7.4%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
0.6%

Energy

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.8%
12.9%

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Technology

3USL.L
36.9%
XS2D.L
46.5%

Financial Services

3USL.L
12.6%
XS2D.L
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3USL.L
10.7%
XS2D.L
0.7%

Communication Services

3USL.L
10.4%
XS2D.L
14.0%

Healthcare

3USL.L
9.0%
XS2D.L
11.8%

Industrials

3USL.L
7.4%
XS2D.L
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

3USL.L
4.7%
XS2D.L
0.6%

Energy

3USL.L
2.8%
XS2D.L

-

Utilities

3USL.L
2.3%
XS2D.L

-

Real Estate

3USL.L
1.8%
XS2D.L
12.9%

Basic Materials

3USL.L
1.5%
XS2D.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3USL.L
3USL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
3USL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3USL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
3USL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3USL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
3USL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3USL.LXS2D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.16

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.28

13.31

-1.02

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3USL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3USL.L and XS2D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3USL.LXS2D.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.29

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.64

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.75

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.81

-0.21

Drawdowns

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3USL.L drawdown since its inception was -76.72%, which is greater than XS2D.L's maximum drawdown of -59.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3USL.L and XS2D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3USL.LXS2D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.72%

-59.31%

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.29%

-16.91%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.69%

-34.83%

-13.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.47%

-46.01%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.72%

-59.31%

-17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.11%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.26%

-9.00%

-6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.31%

4.03%

+2.28%

Volatility

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) at 6.29%. This indicates that 3USL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3USL.LXS2D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.42%

6.29%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.26%

17.01%

+8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.36%

23.39%

+10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.39%

31.74%

+15.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.51%

32.41%

+16.10%

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3USL.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3USL.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, 3USL.L and XS2D.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XS2D.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS2D.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.

3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3USL.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3USL.L and XS2D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer