3USL.L vs. XS2D.L
3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) and XS2D.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Leveraged Equities funds - 3USL.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index while XS2D.L tracks the S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 3USL.L returned 28.49%/yr vs 24.30%/yr for XS2D.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. 3USL.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XS2D.L.
Performance
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3USL.L achieves a 25.13% return, which is significantly higher than XS2D.L's 18.65% return. Over the past 10 years, 3USL.L has outperformed XS2D.L with an annualized return of 28.49%, while XS2D.L has yielded a comparatively lower 24.30% annualized return.
3USL.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 25.13%
- 6M
- 26.49%
- 1Y
- 77.77%
- 3Y*
- 50.50%
- 5Y*
- 22.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
XS2D.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 8.78%
- YTD
- 18.65%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 53.75%
- 3Y*
- 38.35%
- 5Y*
- 20.41%
- 10Y*
- 24.30%
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 25.13% | 28.97% | 64.00% | 70.49% | -57.35% | 101.77% | 7.89% | 97.98% | -27.34% | 69.34% |
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 18.65% | 26.58% | 45.65% | 48.87% | -39.09% | 63.03% | 20.96% | 62.86% | -15.93% | 43.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3USL.L and XS2D.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.99 |
The correlation between 3USL.L and XS2D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Financial Services
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Consumer Cyclical
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Communication Services
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Healthcare
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Industrials
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Consumer Defensive
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Energy
3USL.L
XS2D.L
-
Utilities
3USL.L
XS2D.L
-
Real Estate
3USL.L
XS2D.L
Basic Materials
3USL.L
XS2D.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank
3USL.L
XS2D.L
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3USL.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.16 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.28 | 13.31 | -1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3USL.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.29 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.64 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.75 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.81 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3USL.L drawdown since its inception was -76.72%, which is greater than XS2D.L's maximum drawdown of -59.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3USL.L and XS2D.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3USL.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.72% | -59.31% | -17.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | -16.91% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.69% | -34.83% | -13.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.47% | -46.01% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.72% | -59.31% | -17.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -1.11% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.26% | -9.00% | -6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.31% | 4.03% | +2.28% |
Volatility
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) at 6.29%. This indicates that 3USL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3USL.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | 6.29% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.26% | 17.01% | +8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.36% | 23.39% | +10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.39% | 31.74% | +15.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.51% | 32.41% | +16.10% |
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3USL.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
3USL.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3USL.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, 3USL.L and XS2D.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XS2D.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XS2D.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3USL.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.
Find the right allocation for 3USL.L and XS2D.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer