3USL.L vs. INTL.L
3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) and INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 3USL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index, while INTL.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 3USL.L returned 22.25%/yr vs 16.00%/yr for INTL.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 3USL.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for INTL.L.
Performance
3USL.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3USL.L is traded in USD, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3USL.L achieves a 25.13% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 48.66% return.
3USL.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 25.13%
- 6M
- 26.49%
- 1Y
- 77.77%
- 3Y*
- 50.50%
- 5Y*
- 22.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
INTL.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 18.66%
- YTD
- 48.66%
- 6M
- 49.24%
- 1Y
- 91.38%
- 3Y*
- 34.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.00%
- 10Y*
- —
3USL.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 25.13% | 28.97% | 64.00% | 70.49% | -57.35% | 101.77% | 7.89% | 67.71% |
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 48.66% | 23.14% | 11.68% | 56.56% | -42.06% | 16.29% | 74.16% | 35.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3USL.L and INTL.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between 3USL.L and INTL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
3USL.L vs. INTL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
3USL.L
INTL.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
3USL.L
INTL.L
Financial Services
3USL.L
INTL.L
Consumer Cyclical
3USL.L
INTL.L
Communication Services
3USL.L
INTL.L
Healthcare
3USL.L
INTL.L
Industrials
3USL.L
INTL.L
Consumer Defensive
3USL.L
INTL.L
Energy
3USL.L
INTL.L
-
Utilities
3USL.L
INTL.L
-
Real Estate
3USL.L
INTL.L
-
Basic Materials
3USL.L
INTL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3USL.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank
3USL.L
INTL.L
3USL.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3USL.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.52 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 5.91 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.28 | 18.42 | -6.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3USL.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 3.47 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.58 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.91 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
3USL.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3USL.L drawdown since its inception was -76.72%, which is greater than INTL.L's maximum drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3USL.L and INTL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3USL.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.72% | -48.41% | -28.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | -15.38% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.69% | -31.15% | -17.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.47% | -46.21% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -1.19% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.26% | -13.96% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.31% | 4.94% | +1.37% |
Volatility
3USL.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) have volatilities of 9.42% and 9.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3USL.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | 9.61% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.26% | 19.60% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.36% | 26.18% | +8.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.39% | 27.54% | +19.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.51% | 28.09% | +20.42% |
3USL.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3USL.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
3USL.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3USL.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3USL.L and INTL.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INTL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INTL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
3USL.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3USL.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.
Find the right allocation for 3USL.L and INTL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer