3USL.L vs. DES2.L
3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) and DES2.L (L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 3USL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index, while DES2.L is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 3USL.L returned 27.42%/yr vs -23.24%/yr for DES2.L. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. 3USL.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DES2.L.
Performance
3USL.L vs. DES2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3USL.L is traded in USD, while DES2.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DES2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3USL.L achieves a 22.59% return, which is significantly higher than DES2.L's -7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, 3USL.L has outperformed DES2.L with an annualized return of 27.42%, while DES2.L has yielded a comparatively lower -23.24% annualized return.
3USL.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- YTD
- 22.59%
- 1Y
- 53.10%
- 3Y*
- 42.60%
- 5Y*
- 19.75%
- 10Y*
- 27.42%
DES2.L
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -7.88%
- 1Y
- -10.70%
- 3Y*
- -24.00%
- 5Y*
- -20.76%
- 10Y*
- -23.24%
3USL.L vs. DES2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 22.59% | 28.97% | 63.99% | 70.50% | -57.35% | 101.78% | 7.90% | 97.95% | -26.23% | 66.85% |
DES2.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -7.88% | -27.59% | -29.84% | -26.03% | 1.35% | -36.20% | -29.51% | -40.18% | 29.74% | -18.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3USL.L and DES2.L is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2012 | -0.65 |
The correlation between 3USL.L and DES2.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3USL.L vs. DES2.L — Risk / Return Rank
3USL.L
DES2.L
3USL.L vs. DES2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3USL.L | DES2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.97 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | -0.40 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | -0.88 | +8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3USL.L vs. DES2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3USL.L drawdown since its inception was -76.72%, smaller than the maximum DES2.L drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3USL.L and DES2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3USL.L | DES2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.72% | -99.65% | +22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.29% | -26.68% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.69% | -64.39% | +15.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.46% | -76.16% | +12.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.72% | -93.42% | +16.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -99.63% | +95.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -88.43% | +73.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 12.13% | -5.38% |
Volatility
3USL.L vs. DES2.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DES2.L) have volatilities of 8.83% and 9.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3USL.L | DES2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 9.17% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.74% | 26.51% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.86% | 32.21% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.63% | 33.30% | +14.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.40% | 36.16% | +12.24% |
3USL.L vs. DES2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3USL.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DES2.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
3USL.L vs. DES2.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3USL.L nor DES2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3USL.L and DES2.L have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DES2.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DES2.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
3USL.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DES2.L is Inverse Equities. 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index, while DES2.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3USL.L and 0.60% for DES2.L.
Find the right allocation for 3USL.L and DES2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer