PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Uber ETP Securities EUR (3UBE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3UBE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Uber ETP Securities EUR
-38.67%15.58%-46.92%812.00%-94.83%54.21%
3XFE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR
-29.61%-0.13%87.68%8.62%-43.02%5.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3UBE.L achieves a -38.67% return, which is significantly lower than 3XFE.L's -29.61% return.


3UBE.L

1D
5.51%
1M
-10.93%
YTD
-38.67%
6M
-67.55%
1Y
-45.75%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
10Y*

3XFE.L

1D
5.01%
1M
-8.48%
YTD
-29.61%
6M
-27.38%
1Y
-28.37%
3Y*
23.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3UBE.L and 3XFE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3UBE.L
3UBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
3UBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3UBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
3UBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
3UBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
3UBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

3XFE.L
3XFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
3XFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Uber ETP Securities EUR (3UBE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3UBE.L3XFE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.43

-0.51

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.06

-0.43

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.95

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

-0.75

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-2.03

+0.72

3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3UBE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is comparable to the 3XFE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3UBE.L and 3XFE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3UBE.L3XFE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

-0.51

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.32

-0.06

-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between 3UBE.L and 3XFE.L is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3UBE.L nor 3XFE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3UBE.L drawdown since its inception was -97.79%, which is greater than 3XFE.L's maximum drawdown of -66.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3UBE.L and 3XFE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3UBE.L3XFE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.79%

-66.97%

-30.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.92%

-38.56%

-36.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.18%

-42.09%

-50.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.10%

-35.51%

-46.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.62%

14.32%

+24.30%

Volatility

3UBE.L vs. 3XFE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Uber ETP Securities EUR (3UBE.L) has a higher volatility of 27.08% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) at 14.16%. This indicates that 3UBE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3XFE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3UBE.L3XFE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.08%

14.16%

+12.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.59%

31.74%

+34.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.01%

55.70%

+50.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

138.63%

54.78%

+83.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.63%

54.78%

+83.85%