PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Uber ETP Securities EUR (3UBE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3UBE.L achieves a -41.26% return, which is significantly lower than 2BRE.L's -13.89% return.


3UBE.L

1D
11.31%
1M
-7.74%
YTD
-41.26%
6M
-57.24%
1Y
-58.90%
3Y*
-0.69%
5Y*
10Y*

2BRE.L

1D
0.62%
1M
3.98%
YTD
-13.89%
6M
-14.34%
1Y
-18.63%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3UBE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Uber ETP Securities EUR
-41.26%15.58%-46.92%812.00%-94.83%46.09%
2BRE.L
Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR
-13.89%-4.91%55.13%18.25%4.42%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between 3UBE.L and 2BRE.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.14

The correlation between 3UBE.L and 2BRE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3UBE.L
3UBE.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
3UBE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3UBE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
3UBE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3UBE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
3UBE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

2BRE.L
2BRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
2BRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Uber ETP Securities EUR (3UBE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3UBE.L2BRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.91

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

-0.82

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-1.60

+0.36

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3UBE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is comparable to the 2BRE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3UBE.L and 2BRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3UBE.L2BRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.60

-0.66

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

0.30

-0.62

Drawdowns

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3UBE.L drawdown since its inception was -97.79%, which is greater than 2BRE.L's maximum drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3UBE.L and 2BRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3UBE.L2BRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.79%

-40.62%

-57.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.16%

-22.65%

-53.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.15%

-39.67%

-44.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.51%

-37.26%

-55.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.47%

-19.10%

-63.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.51%

11.62%

+35.89%

Volatility

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Uber ETP Securities EUR (3UBE.L) has a higher volatility of 28.57% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L) at 7.24%. This indicates that 3UBE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2BRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3UBE.L2BRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.57%

7.24%

+21.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.46%

20.36%

+47.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.27%

28.18%

+70.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

137.42%

37.23%

+100.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.42%

37.23%

+100.19%

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3UBE.L and 2BRE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3UBE.L vs. 2BRE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3UBE.L nor 2BRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3UBE.L and 2BRE.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3UBE.L and 2BRE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3UBE.L and 2BRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer