3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

3TSM.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities) and 3GDX.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3TSM.L is passively managed, while 3GDX.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3TSM.L returned 146.20%/yr vs 46.34%/yr for 3GDX.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3TSM.L achieves a 142.39% return, which is significantly higher than 3GDX.L's -39.14% return.

3TSM.L

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: 30.63%
• YTD: 142.39%
• 6M: 154.11%
• 1Y: 581.86%
• 3Y*: 146.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3GDX.L

• 1D: -7.30%
• 1M: -12.20%
• YTD: -39.14%
• 6M: -31.16%
• 1Y: 91.51%
• 3Y*: 46.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3TSM.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities	142.39%	60.55%	288.94%	90.51%	-85.22%	6.05%
3GDX.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC	-39.14%	723.93%	-17.15%	-19.21%	-52.89%	28.41%

Correlation

The correlation between 3TSM.L and 3GDX.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.20

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	3TSM.L	3GDX.L
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3TSM.L

3TSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
3TSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
3TSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
3TSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
3TSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

3GDX.L

3GDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
3GDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
3GDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
3GDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
3GDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
3GDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	3TSM.L	3GDX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.47	0.69	+4.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.98	1.67	+2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.21	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.39	1.28	+11.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	35.93	2.70	+33.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.47, which is higher than the 3GDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3TSM.L and 3GDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3TSM.L	3GDX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.47	0.69	+4.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.14	+0.21

Drawdowns

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3TSM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, which is greater than 3GDX.L's maximum drawdown of -89.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3TSM.L and 3GDX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3TSM.L	3GDX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.59%	-89.13%	-4.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.56%	-71.33%	+24.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.95%	-71.33%	-10.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-70.42%	+68.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.71%	-60.67%	+4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.08%	33.79%	-17.71%

Volatility

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) is 37.57%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) has a volatility of 46.41%. This indicates that 3TSM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3GDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3TSM.L	3GDX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.57%	46.41%	-8.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.75%	107.73%	-29.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	105.63%	131.49%	-25.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.40%	106.11%	+8.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.40%	106.11%	+8.29%

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3TSM.L and 3GDX.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3TSM.L vs. 3GDX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3TSM.L nor 3GDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3TSM.L and 3GDX.L in my portfolio?

3TSM.L and 3GDX.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3TSM.L or 3GDX.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3TSM.L or 3GDX.L?

3TSM.L and 3GDX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.