3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

3TSM.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities) and 2NFL.L (Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3TSM.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSM Index while 2NFL.L tracks the NYSE Leveraged 2x NFLX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3TSM.L returned 138.46%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for 2NFL.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

3TSM.L is traded in USD, while 2NFL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2NFL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3TSM.L achieves a 126.11% return, which is significantly higher than 2NFL.L's -45.17% return.

3TSM.L

• 1D: -18.34%
• 1M: 17.83%
• YTD: 126.11%
• 6M: 140.81%
• 1Y: 433.21%
• 3Y*: 138.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

2NFL.L

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -33.53%
• YTD: -45.17%
• 6M: -45.36%
• 1Y: -72.17%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: -13.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3TSM.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities	126.11%	60.55%	288.94%	90.51%	-85.22%	0.71%
2NFL.L Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP	-45.17%	-13.99%	188.09%	126.59%	-88.48%	10.57%

Correlation

The correlation between 3TSM.L and 2NFL.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between 3TSM.L and 2NFL.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	3TSM.L	2NFL.L
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3TSM.L

3TSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
3TSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
3TSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
3TSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
3TSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

2NFL.L

2NFL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1
2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
2NFL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
2NFL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
2NFL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
2NFL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	3TSM.L	2NFL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.95	-1.12	+5.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	-2.06	+5.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	0.73	+0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.23	-0.96	+10.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.33	-1.51	+27.84

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.95, which is higher than the 2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3TSM.L and 2NFL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3TSM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, roughly equal to the maximum 2NFL.L drawdown of -96.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3TSM.L and 2NFL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3TSM.L	2NFL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.59%	-96.36%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.56%	-75.37%	+28.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.95%	-75.37%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-96.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.34%	-75.37%	+57.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.00%	-52.54%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.35%	47.93%	-31.58%

Volatility

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) has a higher volatility of 38.30% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) at 15.91%. This indicates that 3TSM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2NFL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3TSM.L	2NFL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.30%	15.91%	+22.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	82.55%	51.73%	+30.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	108.74%	64.49%	+44.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.53%	93.32%	+28.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.53%	88.48%	+33.05%

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3TSM.L and 2NFL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3TSM.L vs. 2NFL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3TSM.L nor 2NFL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3TSM.L and 2NFL.L in my portfolio?

3TSM.L and 2NFL.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3TSM.L or 2NFL.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3TSM.L or 2NFL.L?

3TSM.L and 2NFL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

What is the main difference between 3TSM.L and 2NFL.L?

3TSM.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSM Index, while 2NFL.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x NFLX Index.