PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX (3TSL.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3TSL.L is traded in GBp, while QQQ3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3TSL.L achieves a -35.52% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ3.L's 60.62% return.


3TSL.L

1D
4.45%
1M
24.10%
YTD
-35.52%
6M
-32.22%
1Y
-21.67%
3Y*
-39.51%
5Y*
-50.12%
10Y*

QQQ3.L

1D
0.26%
1M
33.91%
YTD
60.62%
6M
55.17%
1Y
134.33%
3Y*
62.52%
5Y*
28.82%
10Y*
45.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3TSL.L
Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX
-35.52%-71.66%25.48%217.46%-99.04%127.69%
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
60.62%18.54%62.70%194.03%-77.15%93.72%

Correlation

The correlation between 3TSL.L and QQQ3.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021

0.58

The correlation between 3TSL.L and QQQ3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3TSL.L
3TSL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
3TSL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3TSL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
3TSL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
3TSL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
3TSL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ3.L
QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX (3TSL.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3TSL.LQQQ3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.41

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

3.72

-4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

10.93

-11.51

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3TSL.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3TSL.L and QQQ3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3TSL.LQQQ3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

2.90

-3.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.48

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

0.87

-1.20

Drawdowns

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3TSL.L drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than QQQ3.L's maximum drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3TSL.L and QQQ3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3TSL.LQQQ3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.83%

-79.21%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.97%

-35.87%

-36.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.49%

-58.56%

-36.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.83%

-79.21%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.64%

0.00%

-99.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.99%

-18.79%

-67.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.52%

12.24%

+25.28%

Volatility

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX (3TSL.L) has a higher volatility of 38.75% compared to WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) at 14.21%. This indicates that 3TSL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3TSL.LQQQ3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.75%

14.21%

+24.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

84.86%

33.76%

+51.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.57%

46.16%

+91.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.00%

60.36%

+105.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

165.84%

58.56%

+107.28%

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3TSL.L and QQQ3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3TSL.L vs. QQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3TSL.L nor QQQ3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3TSL.L and QQQ3.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3TSL.L and QQQ3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3TSL.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ3.L is Nasdaq-100. 3TSL.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSLA Index, while QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3TSL.L and QQQ3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer