PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX (3TSL.L) and IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3TSL.L is traded in GBp, while TLTI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TLTI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3TSL.L achieves a -35.52% return, which is significantly lower than TLTI.L's -5.44% return.


3TSL.L

1D
4.45%
1M
24.10%
YTD
-35.52%
6M
-32.22%
1Y
-21.67%
3Y*
-39.51%
5Y*
-50.12%
10Y*

TLTI.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-5.44%
6M
-7.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 3TSL.L and TLTI.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3TSL.L
3TSL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
3TSL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3TSL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
3TSL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
3TSL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
3TSL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTI.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX (3TSL.L) and IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3TSL.LTLTI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3TSL.LTLTI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

-0.33

0.00

Drawdowns

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3TSL.L drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than TLTI.L's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3TSL.L and TLTI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3TSL.LTLTI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.83%

-14.19%

-85.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.64%

-13.41%

-86.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.99%

-6.57%

-79.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.52%

Volatility

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3TSL.LTLTI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

84.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.57%

13.44%

+124.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.00%

13.44%

+152.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

165.84%

13.44%

+152.40%

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3TSL.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

3TSL.L vs. TLTI.L - Dividend Comparison

3TSL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.


Frequently Asked Questions


3TSL.L and TLTI.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLTI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLTI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3TSL.L.

3TSL.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TLTI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3TSL.L and 0.55% for TLTI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3TSL.L and TLTI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer