3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L
3SIL.L (WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged) and SLVI.L (IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP) are both Silver funds. 3SIL.L is passively managed, while SLVI.L is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 3SIL.L charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SLVI.L.
Performance
3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3SIL.L achieves a -58.34% return, which is significantly lower than SLVI.L's -3.20% return.
3SIL.L
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -58.34%
- 6M
- -31.50%
- 1Y
- 141.28%
- 3Y*
- 48.06%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- -1.65%
SLVI.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 6M
- 17.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3SIL.L WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged | -58.34% | 423.75% |
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP | -3.20% | 73.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3SIL.L and SLVI.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3SIL.L
SLVI.L
3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged (3SIL.L) and IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3SIL.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3SIL.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 1.46 | -1.68 |
Drawdowns
3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3SIL.L drawdown since its inception was -99.33%, which is greater than SLVI.L's maximum drawdown of -37.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3SIL.L and SLVI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3SIL.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.33% | -37.77% | -61.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.98% | -34.15% | -61.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.34% | -12.28% | -82.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.22% | — | — |
Volatility
3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3SIL.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 179.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 174.29% | 50.86% | +123.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.78% | 50.86% | +58.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.45% | 50.86% | +44.59% |
3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3SIL.L has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVI.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
3SIL.L vs. SLVI.L - Dividend Comparison
3SIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
3SIL.L WisdomTree Silver 3x Daily Leveraged | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP | 0.11% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, 3SIL.L and SLVI.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SLVI.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVI.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for 3SIL.L.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and IncomeShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for 3SIL.L and 0.35% for SLVI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3SIL.L and SLVI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer