PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x PayPal ETP Securities EUR (3PYE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3PYE.L is traded in EUR, while 3VT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3VT.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3PYE.L achieves a -73.82% return, which is significantly lower than 3VT.L's 29.01% return.


3PYE.L

1D
-12.46%
1M
-41.94%
YTD
-73.82%
6M
-77.23%
1Y
-89.21%
3Y*
-65.15%
5Y*
-84.45%
10Y*

3VT.L

1D
-1.57%
1M
12.80%
YTD
29.01%
6M
32.13%
1Y
71.15%
3Y*
37.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3PYE.L
Leverage Shares 3x PayPal ETP Securities EUR
-73.82%-85.07%59.76%-60.67%-98.90%10.92%
3VT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP
29.01%21.88%38.77%46.22%-51.49%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between 3PYE.L and 3VT.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.50

The correlation between 3PYE.L and 3VT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3PYE.L
3PYE.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
3PYE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3PYE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
3PYE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
3PYE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
3PYE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

3VT.L
3VT.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
3VT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3VT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
3VT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
3VT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
3VT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x PayPal ETP Securities EUR (3PYE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3PYE.L3VT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.32

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

2.69

-3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

10.19

-11.59

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3PYE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the 3VT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3PYE.L and 3VT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3PYE.L3VT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

1.90

-2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.69

0.23

-0.92

Drawdowns

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3PYE.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than 3VT.L's maximum drawdown of -60.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3PYE.L and 3VT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3PYE.L3VT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-60.63%

-39.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.47%

-26.36%

-66.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.62%

-48.18%

-49.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-1.57%

-98.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.28%

-26.46%

-62.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

63.51%

6.96%

+56.55%

Volatility

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x PayPal ETP Securities EUR (3PYE.L) has a higher volatility of 35.97% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L) at 10.39%. This indicates that 3PYE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3VT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3PYE.L3VT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.97%

10.39%

+25.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

108.43%

29.23%

+79.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

115.23%

37.25%

+77.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.20%

48.59%

+72.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.98%

48.59%

+71.39%

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3PYE.L and 3VT.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3PYE.L vs. 3VT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3PYE.L nor 3VT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3PYE.L and 3VT.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3PYE.L and 3VT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3PYE.L and 3VT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer