3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L
3PLT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities) and GOOO.L (IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3PLT.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x PLTR Index, while GOOO.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 3PLT.L is passively managed, while GOOO.L is actively managed. Over the past year, 3PLT.L returned -49.99% vs 71.84% for GOOO.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3PLT.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for GOOO.L.
Performance
3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3PLT.L achieves a -67.40% return, which is significantly lower than GOOO.L's 6.47% return.
3PLT.L
- 1D
- -10.34%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- -67.40%
- 6M
- -65.26%
- 1Y
- -49.99%
- 3Y*
- 156.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOO.L
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 71.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities | -67.40% | 154.21% | 581.36% |
GOOO.L IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP | 6.47% | 35.20% | 25.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3PLT.L and GOOO.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L — Risk / Return Rank
3PLT.L
GOOO.L
3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3PLT.L | GOOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.48 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 5.16 | -5.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 16.67 | -17.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3PLT.L | GOOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 3.01 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 1.66 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3PLT.L drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than GOOO.L's maximum drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3PLT.L and GOOO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3PLT.L | GOOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -28.28% | -71.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.49% | -13.85% | -71.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.19% | -10.30% | -76.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.65% | -7.48% | -77.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.77% | 4.30% | +48.47% |
Volatility
3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) has a higher volatility of 52.34% compared to IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L) at 6.91%. This indicates that 3PLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3PLT.L | GOOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 52.34% | 6.91% | +45.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.30% | 14.66% | +94.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.17% | 23.78% | +126.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.72% | 25.27% | +168.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 193.72% | 25.27% | +168.45% |
3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3PLT.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
3PLT.L vs. GOOO.L - Dividend Comparison
3PLT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOO.L IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP | 22.91% | 11.49% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3PLT.L and GOOO.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GOOO.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOOO.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3PLT.L.
3PLT.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GOOO.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3PLT.L and 0.55% for GOOO.L.
Find the right allocation for 3PLT.L and GOOO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer