3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L
3MSE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR) and 2FB.L (Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3MSE.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index while 2FB.L tracks the NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 3MSE.L returned -10.30%/yr vs -6.71%/yr for 2FB.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3MSE.L is traded in EUR, while 2FB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2FB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3MSE.L achieves a -62.40% return, which is significantly lower than 2FB.L's -36.21% return.
3MSE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -28.26%
- YTD
- -62.40%
- 6M
- -62.31%
- 1Y
- -68.46%
- 3Y*
- -18.77%
- 5Y*
- -10.30%
- 10Y*
- —
2FB.L
- 1D
- -4.22%
- 1M
- -17.14%
- YTD
- -36.21%
- 6M
- -35.74%
- 1Y
- -50.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.45%
- 5Y*
- -6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3MSE.L Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR | -62.40% | -6.09% | 20.99% | 175.47% | -76.35% | 237.47% | 36.89% |
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -36.21% | -13.34% | 139.59% | 611.91% | -92.56% | 52.33% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3MSE.L and 2FB.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between 3MSE.L and 2FB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L — Risk / Return Rank
3MSE.L
2FB.L
3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3MSE.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.84 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -1.42 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3MSE.L drawdown since its inception was -82.27%, smaller than the maximum 2FB.L drawdown of -96.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3MSE.L and 2FB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3MSE.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.27% | -96.20% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.33% | -60.51% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.33% | -65.25% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.27% | -96.20% | +13.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.51% | -63.39% | -12.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.08% | -41.84% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.14% | 35.67% | +11.47% |
Volatility
3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L) has a higher volatility of 32.61% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) at 21.42%. This indicates that 3MSE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2FB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3MSE.L | 2FB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.61% | 21.42% | +11.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.21% | 53.05% | +23.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.19% | 68.51% | +14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.97% | 84.37% | -7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.51% | 79.10% | -2.59% |
3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3MSE.L and 2FB.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3MSE.L vs. 2FB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3MSE.L nor 2FB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3MSE.L and 2FB.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3MSE.L and 2FB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3MSE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index, while 2FB.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index.
Find the right allocation for 3MSE.L and 2FB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer