3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

3KOR.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities) and 2NFL.L (Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3KOR.L is actively managed, while 2NFL.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3KOR.L returned 94.97%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for 2NFL.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

3KOR.L is traded in USD, while 2NFL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2NFL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3KOR.L achieves a 330.87% return, which is significantly higher than 2NFL.L's -46.41% return.

3KOR.L

• 1D: 8.84%
• 1M: -15.95%
• YTD: 330.87%
• 6M: 388.13%
• 1Y: 859.74%
• 3Y*: 94.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

2NFL.L

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -33.07%
• YTD: -46.41%
• 6M: -46.31%
• 1Y: -74.53%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: -14.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
3KOR.L Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities	330.87%	356.68%	-62.34%	15.02%	-56.31%
2NFL.L Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP	-46.41%	-13.99%	188.09%	126.59%	83.70%

Correlation

The correlation between 3KOR.L and 2NFL.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2022	0.21

The correlation between 3KOR.L and 2NFL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	3KOR.L	2NFL.L
Technology	63.4%	-
Industrials	15.2%	-
Financial Services	7.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	-
Healthcare	2.5%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	1.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	-
Energy	0.9%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3KOR.L

3KOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
3KOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
3KOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
3KOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
3KOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

2NFL.L

2NFL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1
2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
2NFL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
2NFL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
2NFL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
2NFL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	3KOR.L	2NFL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.98	-1.16	+8.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	-2.23	+6.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	0.71	+0.85
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.17	-0.98	+15.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.74	-1.54	+43.28

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.98, which is higher than the 2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3KOR.L and 2NFL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3KOR.L drawdown since its inception was -85.50%, smaller than the maximum 2NFL.L drawdown of -96.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3KOR.L and 2NFL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3KOR.L	2NFL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.50%	-96.36%	+10.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.08%	-75.93%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.07%	-75.93%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-96.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.18%	-75.93%	+43.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.45%	-52.56%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.43%	48.40%	-27.97%

Volatility

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a higher volatility of 60.68% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) at 15.43%. This indicates that 3KOR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2NFL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3KOR.L	2NFL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	60.68%	15.43%	+45.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	112.48%	51.66%	+60.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	121.98%	64.15%	+57.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.36%	93.30%	-6.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.36%	88.44%	-2.08%

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3KOR.L and 2NFL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3KOR.L vs. 2NFL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3KOR.L nor 2NFL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3KOR.L and 2NFL.L in my portfolio?

3KOR.L and 2NFL.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3KOR.L or 2NFL.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3KOR.L or 2NFL.L?

3KOR.L and 2NFL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.