3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE
3JPN.DE (Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities) and QQQY.DE (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - 3JPN.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while QQQY.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, 3JPN.DE returned 72.37% vs 29.21% for QQQY.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3JPN.DE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQY.DE.
Performance
3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3JPN.DE achieves a 37.51% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY.DE's 16.00% return.
3JPN.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 37.51%
- 6M
- 34.92%
- 1Y
- 72.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3JPN.DE Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities | 37.51% | 27.74% | 1.21% |
QQQY.DE IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR | 16.00% | 2.36% | 2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3JPN.DE and QQQY.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE — Risk / Return Rank
3JPN.DE
QQQY.DE
3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3JPN.DE | QQQY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.81 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 3.02 | +2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3JPN.DE | QQQY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3JPN.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.65%, which is greater than QQQY.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3JPN.DE and QQQY.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3JPN.DE | QQQY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.65% | -25.57% | -26.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.71% | -16.34% | -18.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -1.03% | -6.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -10.47% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.19% | 9.83% | +2.36% |
Volatility
3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE) at 3.94%. This indicates that 3JPN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3JPN.DE | QQQY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 3.94% | +7.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.68% | 9.18% | +39.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.28% | 25.46% | +34.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.77% | 27.58% | +25.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.77% | 27.58% | +25.19% |
3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
3JPN.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
3JPN.DE vs. QQQY.DE - Dividend Comparison
3JPN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
3JPN.DE Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY.DE IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR | 67.30% | 128.10% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3JPN.DE and QQQY.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQY.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQY.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.
3JPN.DE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQY.DE is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3JPN.DE and 0.45% for QQQY.DE.
Find the right allocation for 3JPN.DE and QQQY.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer