PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3GOO.L is traded in GBp, while QQQ3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOO.L achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ3.L's 39.39% return.


3GOO.L

1D
-8.11%
1M
-30.66%
YTD
7.47%
6M
4.21%
1Y
434.77%
3Y*
83.55%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*

QQQ3.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
39.39%
6M
36.71%
1Y
90.97%
3Y*
53.54%
5Y*
21.58%
10Y*
46.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3GOO.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP
7.47%146.08%80.34%154.87%-85.80%292.19%40.82%
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
39.39%18.54%62.70%194.03%-77.15%89.15%111.93%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOO.L and QQQ3.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between 3GOO.L and QQQ3.L has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOO.L
3GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ3.L
QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3GOO.LQQQ3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.30

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.52

2.52

+6.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.06

7.25

+17.81

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.98, which is higher than the QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOO.L and QQQ3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, which is greater than QQQ3.L's maximum drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOO.L and QQQ3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOO.LQQQ3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.06%

-79.21%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.61%

-35.87%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.88%

-58.56%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.06%

-79.21%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.18%

-13.25%

-25.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.82%

-18.25%

-24.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.24%

12.51%

+4.73%

Volatility

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) has a higher volatility of 30.36% compared to WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) at 19.34%. This indicates that 3GOO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOO.LQQQ3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.36%

19.34%

+11.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.46%

37.92%

+20.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.76%

48.77%

+37.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.96%

60.81%

+30.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.22%

58.92%

+30.30%

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3GOO.L and QQQ3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3GOO.L vs. QQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOO.L nor QQQ3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GOO.L and QQQ3.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3GOO.L and QQQ3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3GOO.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ3.L is Nasdaq-100. 3GOO.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index, while QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOO.L and QQQ3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer