PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOO.L achieves a 31.45% return, which is significantly higher than DS2P.L's -11.43% return.


3GOO.L

1D
12.74%
1M
-3.56%
6M
9.90%
YTD
31.45%
1Y
430.42%
3Y*
92.29%
5Y*
22.53%
10Y*

DS2P.L

1D
1.26%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-1.25%
YTD
-11.43%
1Y
-10.34%
3Y*
-24.61%
5Y*
-20.24%
10Y*
-23.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3GOO.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP
31.45%146.08%80.34%154.87%-85.80%292.19%40.82%
DS2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-11.43%-29.68%-28.35%-29.73%13.75%-35.96%-24.21%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOO.L and DS2P.L is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

-0.39

The correlation between 3GOO.L and DS2P.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.39 (all time) to -0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOO.L
3GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DS2P.L
DS2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3GOO.LDS2P.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.97

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.44

-0.38

+8.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.65

-0.82

+23.47

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.89, which is higher than the DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOO.L and DS2P.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, smaller than the maximum DS2P.L drawdown of -99.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOO.L and DS2P.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOO.LDS2P.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.06%

-99.62%

+11.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.61%

-27.26%

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.88%

-67.63%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.06%

-78.85%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.60%

-99.60%

+74.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-89.22%

+46.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.89%

12.75%

+6.14%

Volatility

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) has a higher volatility of 25.26% compared to L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) at 9.55%. This indicates that 3GOO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DS2P.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOO.LDS2P.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.26%

9.55%

+15.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.25%

28.12%

+31.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.37%

34.11%

+53.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.25%

36.75%

+54.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.13%

38.73%

+50.40%

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3GOO.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DS2P.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

3GOO.L vs. DS2P.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOO.L nor DS2P.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GOO.L and DS2P.L have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DS2P.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DS2P.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3GOO.L.

3GOO.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index, while DS2P.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3GOO.L and 0.50% for DS2P.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOO.L and DS2P.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer