PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3GOO.L is traded in GBp, while 3QQQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3QQQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOO.L achieves a 34.83% return, which is significantly lower than 3QQQ.L's 55.82% return.


3GOO.L

1D
8.98%
1M
-15.53%
YTD
34.83%
6M
27.25%
1Y
608.54%
3Y*
85.26%
5Y*
30.26%
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
-1.99%
1M
28.14%
YTD
55.82%
6M
48.52%
1Y
122.07%
3Y*
52.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3GOO.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP
34.83%146.08%80.34%154.87%-68.83%
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
55.82%5.78%63.73%172.86%-55.10%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOO.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.58

The correlation between 3GOO.L and 3QQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOO.L
3GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GOO.L3QQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.40

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.92

2.56

+9.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.79

5.32

+32.46

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.23, which is higher than the 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOO.L and 3QQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GOO.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23

1.93

+5.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.55

0.00

Drawdowns

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, which is greater than 3QQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -58.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOO.L and 3QQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOO.L3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.06%

-58.71%

-29.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.61%

-47.38%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.88%

-58.71%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.69%

-1.99%

-21.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-20.53%

-24.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.99%

22.84%

-6.85%

Volatility

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) has a higher volatility of 22.98% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) at 14.48%. This indicates that 3GOO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOO.L3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.98%

14.48%

+8.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.81%

33.01%

+20.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.45%

63.04%

+20.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.52%

62.77%

+26.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.77%

62.77%

+27.00%

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3GOO.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

3GOO.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOO.L nor 3QQQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GOO.L and 3QQQ.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3QQQ.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3QQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3GOO.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3GOO.L and 0.01% for 3QQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOO.L and 3QQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer