PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3GOO.L is traded in GBp, while 3APE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3APE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GOO.L achieves a 34.83% return, which is significantly higher than 3APE.L's 30.32% return.


3GOO.L

1D
8.98%
1M
-15.53%
YTD
34.83%
6M
27.25%
1Y
608.54%
3Y*
85.26%
5Y*
30.26%
10Y*

3APE.L

1D
-1.15%
1M
34.55%
YTD
30.32%
6M
16.92%
1Y
162.75%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
25.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3GOO.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP
34.83%146.08%80.34%154.87%-85.80%293.65%12.30%
3APE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR
30.32%-28.19%70.01%152.53%-72.84%83.45%-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GOO.L and 3APE.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2020

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between 3GOO.L and 3APE.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GOO.L
3GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

3APE.L
3APE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
3APE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3APE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3APE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
3APE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
3APE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3GOO.L3APE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.34

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.92

3.89

+8.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.79

8.77

+29.01

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio is 7.23, which is higher than the 3APE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GOO.L and 3APE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3GOO.L3APE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23

2.36

+4.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.32

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.30

+0.25

Drawdowns

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GOO.L drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, which is greater than 3APE.L's maximum drawdown of -75.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GOO.L and 3APE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GOO.L3APE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.06%

-75.68%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.61%

-41.58%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.88%

-72.96%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.06%

-75.68%

-12.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.69%

-9.04%

-14.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-35.88%

-8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.99%

18.47%

-2.48%

Volatility

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) has a higher volatility of 22.98% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) at 15.51%. This indicates that 3GOO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3APE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GOO.L3APE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.98%

15.51%

+7.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.81%

49.57%

+4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.45%

68.66%

+14.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.52%

79.46%

+10.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.77%

83.99%

+5.78%

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3GOO.L and 3APE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3GOO.L vs. 3APE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GOO.L nor 3APE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GOO.L and 3APE.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3GOO.L and 3APE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3GOO.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X GOOG Index, while 3APE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GOO.L and 3APE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer