3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L
3GDX.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC) and SOXL.L (Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3GDX.L is actively managed, while SOXL.L is passively managed. Over the past year, 3GDX.L returned 89.48% vs 2188.86% for SOXL.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3GDX.L achieves a -37.43% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL.L's 798.38% return.
3GDX.L
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- -37.43%
- 6M
- -28.11%
- 1Y
- 89.48%
- 3Y*
- 48.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL.L
- 1D
- -9.76%
- 1M
- 108.32%
- YTD
- 798.38%
- 6M
- 722.46%
- 1Y
- 2,188.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3GDX.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC | -37.43% | 723.93% | 3.15% |
SOXL.L Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities | 798.38% | 11.41% | -59.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3GDX.L and SOXL.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L — Risk / Return Rank
3GDX.L
SOXL.L
3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) and Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3GDX.L | SOXL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.62 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 41.59 | -40.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 125.57 | -122.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3GDX.L | SOXL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 15.90 | -15.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.64 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3GDX.L drawdown since its inception was -89.13%, smaller than the maximum SOXL.L drawdown of -95.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GDX.L and SOXL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3GDX.L | SOXL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.13% | -95.66% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.33% | -51.95% | -19.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.59% | -9.76% | -59.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.67% | -60.63% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.06% | 17.24% | +16.82% |
Volatility
3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) is 46.50%, while Leverage Shares 4x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SOXL.L) has a volatility of 57.30%. This indicates that 3GDX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3GDX.L | SOXL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 46.50% | 57.30% | -10.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.76% | 104.35% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 131.41% | 136.04% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.07% | 137.56% | -31.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.07% | 137.56% | -31.49% |
3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3GDX.L and SOXL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3GDX.L vs. SOXL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3GDX.L nor SOXL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3GDX.L and SOXL.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3GDX.L and SOXL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3GDX.L and SOXL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer