3GDX.L vs. AVGI.L
3GDX.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC) and AVGI.L (IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 3GDX.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while AVGI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. 3GDX.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AVGI.L.
Performance
3GDX.L vs. AVGI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
3GDX.L
- 1D
- -20.09%
- 1M
- -37.98%
- YTD
- -50.00%
- 6M
- -43.32%
- 1Y
- 51.18%
- 3Y*
- 39.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGI.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3GDX.L vs. AVGI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3GDX.L
AVGI.L
3GDX.L vs. AVGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC (3GDX.L) and IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3GDX.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3GDX.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | — | — |
Drawdowns
3GDX.L vs. AVGI.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3GDX.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.70% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.69% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.39% | — | — |
Volatility
3GDX.L vs. AVGI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3GDX.L | AVGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 47.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.82% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.67% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.67% | — | — |
3GDX.L vs. AVGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3GDX.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
3GDX.L vs. AVGI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3GDX.L nor AVGI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AVGI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3GDX.L.
3GDX.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AVGI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3GDX.L and 0.55% for AVGI.L.
Find the right allocation for 3GDX.L and AVGI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer